When you take a flower in your hand and really look at it, it’s your world for the moment. I want to give that world to someone else. Most people in the city rush around so they have no time to look at a flower. I want them to see it whether they want to or not.
– Georgia O'Keeffe, from an interview with The NewYork Post, 1946
-
Plants and nature have been the artists’ muse since the earliest cave paintings depicting mushrooms, cactus, and flowers – powdered mineral pigments rubbed onto stone in the flicker of firelight. Nature is inspiration across all mediums and art forms, word to page, ink to canvas, the snap of the shutter. There are certain artists for whom nature was a central and continually evolving motivation to manifest work, artists we immediately align with imagery of flowers or plants, trees, or gardens.
Van Gogh’s sunflowers, vivid and bright, the artist documenting the natural realm with a vibratory, slightly hallucinogenic immediacy. There is Monet in his garden at Giverny, growing wildflowers beside Roses, crawling vines amid tidy shrubs, a garden painted more than planted, organized with the beautiful cacophony of an artist’s palette. There is the Symbolist Paul Gauguin, immersed in his sunlight and Palms, French Polynesian reveries; and the luminous floral explorations of Henri Matisse, once quoted as saying, “There are always flowers for those who want to see them.” Centuries prior, in the 1500s, the Italian painter Giuseppe Arcimboldo created playful detailed paintings by anthropomorphizing plants, fruits and flowers into figures in a series of works that set the natural realm at their center.